Theoretical Physicist Richard Feynman with His Drums     Uncredited and Undated Photograph “Electrons, when they were first discovered, behaved exactly like particles or bullets, very simply. Further research showed, from electron diffraction experiments for example, that they behaved like waves. As time went on there was a growing confusion about how these things really behaved —— waves or particles, particles or waves? Everything looked like both. This growing confusion was resolved in 1925 or 1926 with the advent of the correct equations for quantum mechanics. Now we know how the electrons and light behave. But what can I call it? If I say they behave like particles I give the wrong impression; also if I say they behave like waves. They behave in their own inimitable way, which technically could be called a quantum mechanical way. They behave in a way that is like nothing that you have seen before. Your experience with things that you have seen before is incomplete. The behavior of things on a very tiny scale is simply different. An atom does not behave like a weight hanging on a spring and oscillating. Nor does it behave like a miniature representation of the solar system with little planets going around in orbits. Nor does it appear to be somewhat like a cloud or fog of some sort surrounding the nucleus. It behaves like nothing you have seen before. There is one simplication at least. Electrons behave in this respect in exactly the same way as photons; they are both screwy, but in exactly in the same way…. The difficulty really is psychological and exists in the perpetual torment that results from your saying to yourself, ‘But how can it be like that?’ which is a reflection of uncontrolled but utterly vain desire to see it in terms of something familiar. I will not describe it in terms of an analogy with something familiar; I will simply describe it. There was a time when the newspapers said that only twelve men understood the theory of relativity. I do not believe there ever was such a time. There might have been a time when only one man did, because he was the only guy who caught on, before he wrote his paper. But after people read the paper a lot of people understood the theory of relativity in some way or other, certainly more than twelve. On the other hand, I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. So do not take the lecture too seriously, feeling that you really have to understand in terms of some model what I am going to describe, but just relax and enjoy it. I am going to tell you what nature behaves like. If you will simply admit that maybe she does behave like this, you will find her a delightful, entrancing thing. Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possible avoid it, ‘But how can it be like that?’ because you will get ‘down the drain’, into a blind alley from which nobody has escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like that.”  Richard P. Feynman, The Messenger Lectures, MIT, 1964

Theoretical Physicist Richard Feynman with His Drums     Uncredited and Undated Photograph

“Electrons, when they were first discovered, behaved exactly like particles or bullets, very simply. Further research showed, from electron diffraction experiments for example, that they behaved like waves. As time went on there was a growing confusion about how these things really behaved —— waves or particles, particles or waves? Everything looked like both.

This growing confusion was resolved in 1925 or 1926 with the advent of the correct equations for quantum mechanics. Now we know how the electrons and light behave. But what can I call it? If I say they behave like particles I give the wrong impression; also if I say they behave like waves. They behave in their own inimitable way, which technically could be called a quantum mechanical way. They behave in a way that is like nothing that you have seen before. Your experience with things that you have seen before is incomplete. The behavior of things on a very tiny scale is simply different. An atom does not behave like a weight hanging on a spring and oscillating. Nor does it behave like a miniature representation of the solar system with little planets going around in orbits. Nor does it appear to be somewhat like a cloud or fog of some sort surrounding the nucleus. It behaves like nothing you have seen before.

There is one simplication at least. Electrons behave in this respect in exactly the same way as photons; they are both screwy, but in exactly in the same way….

The difficulty really is psychological and exists in the perpetual torment that results from your saying to yourself, ‘But how can it be like that?’ which is a reflection of uncontrolled but utterly vain desire to see it in terms of something familiar. I will not describe it in terms of an analogy with something familiar; I will simply describe it. There was a time when the newspapers said that only twelve men understood the theory of relativity. I do not believe there ever was such a time. There might have been a time when only one man did, because he was the only guy who caught on, before he wrote his paper. But after people read the paper a lot of people understood the theory of relativity in some way or other, certainly more than twelve. On the other hand, I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. So do not take the lecture too seriously, feeling that you really have to understand in terms of some model what I am going to describe, but just relax and enjoy it. I am going to tell you what nature behaves like. If you will simply admit that maybe she does behave like this, you will find her a delightful, entrancing thing. Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possible avoid it, ‘But how can it be like that?’ because you will get ‘down the drain’, into a blind alley from which nobody has escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like that.”  Richard P. Feynman, The Messenger Lectures, MIT, 1964

82 notes

  1. ondocarniliono reblogged this from aperture-inc
  2. athsear reblogged this from aperture-inc
  3. thelonelyturnip reblogged this from aperture-inc
  4. thedancingtoast reblogged this from aperture-inc
  5. believemeitsbutter reblogged this from squishu
  6. lukkyz reblogged this from aperture-inc
  7. free-king reblogged this from aperture-inc
  8. squishu reblogged this from aperture-inc
  9. aperture-inc reblogged this from contemplatingmadness
  10. supercuddlypuppies reblogged this from antitau
  11. groupprojectssuck reblogged this from contemplatingmadness
  12. nonmoralsense reblogged this from blindmen6
  13. contemplatingmadness reblogged this from antitau
  14. at-the-dope-show reblogged this from antitau
  15. raccoonswithlightsabers reblogged this from antitau
  16. antitau reblogged this from blindmen6
  17. suicide-in-the-trenches reblogged this from blindmen6
  18. blindmen6 reblogged this from fuckyeahfeynman and added:
    Feynman speaking about electrons and photons
  19. detestdetest reblogged this from recursiverecursion
  20. preisser reblogged this from fuckyeahfeynman
  21. bluekhepresh reblogged this from recursiverecursion
  22. recursiverecursion reblogged this from fuckyeahfeynman
  23. trollception reblogged this from fuckyeahquantummechanics
  24. celticheavens reblogged this from fuckyeahquantummechanics and added:
    Physics is truly a lovely subject. There’s so much intricacy involved in even the simplest of theories (at least that’s...
  25. thepoemthatdoesntrhyme reblogged this from jamesisaghostdad
  26. redakota reblogged this from fuckyeahfeynman
  27. ozymandiasdali reblogged this from fuckyeahquantummechanics
  28. neuroconnoisseur reblogged this from jamesisaghostdad
  29. smooshyaguacate reblogged this from fuckyeahfeynman